|
Wire
at the Stereo Society (selected
links): To
Wire discography
Click
to download Wire historical memorabilia, text or hi-res graphic. Bruce,
you are always doing something different. What are you up to now
and how has that lead on from where you've been? You say "amusingly," but
half of the music-making business or half of the people who are making
music are functioning with remixes and transmutations of material. In the
broader sense. We are halfway to questions about the collaborative
arts and collaborations between people taking somebody else's material
and transmuting it. You always
use the word, "activity," and also, "music and
art," almost to be interchangeable. Whether
in the fine arts, to use an unfashionable phrase, or in music, there was
always a popular access. It was always possible to start and to do
it yourself which was the essence of the Punk Era, and this is something
you used as a springboard. Do you think that's possible at all, twenty
years later? Do you think this is a constant of the society we are in? There
is a long tradition starting in the sixties with the art school graduate
who became a musician. You are
very optimistic about the new experimentation that's possible at the grass
roots level, so to speak, but in practice what's happening with commercial
art is that it is moving into larger and larger mass-market exercises resulting
in acts like The Spice Girls and the obsession with them. The Punk
Era was the prime example, possibly the best example, of a simple
technology assisting a very simple expression but a very freshened new
expression. You are talking about other simple technologies also
coming out enabling people. Do you think that a simple technique
is an easier way to a simple, clear expression of an idea? Often,
what comes out of this new technology, is a priesthood of people who are
the so-called professionals and the so-called experts, and rejecting the
priesthood was an important facet of Punk in the seventies just
as it was an important component of other artistic movements and rebellions
in earlier times. Do you think this is a cyclical process? Could
we expect one today? It seems a little quiet at the moment. The paradox
often became, though, that having integrity meant it was worn like a haircut,
and people became more concerned with integrity than, perhaps, what it
was actually lying on. Do you
think the pretense of integrity or the imitation of integrity undermines
the impact of the real thing on the audience or the possibility of the
real thing being recognized by the audience? Do you
think the twelve-year-old girl ideal music business target is a relatively
recent ideal? What
happens to old codgers like us who still want a little intensity from what
they are seeing around them, but don't go into record stores and, typically,
as "baby boomers," have an awful lot of discretionary income? What
happens to their musical and artistic consumption? What
might be popular among people thirty years old and up? Should it
be any different from the rest? Do you expect a growth of understanding
or perception as the audience ages? You talk
about graduating to much more subtle forms of musical genres. Did
you start with The Spice Girls equivalent listening to popular music? It looks
like you had a very short step though to the chain saw plus guitar. Please
explain. So, for
you things got simpler and simpler with Blues music and with the
chain saw guitar drone. Why is it that Wire lyrics still provoke
arguments among the fans about the actual 'meaning' of the oblique collision
of a very simple sound with often very abstract images? Of the Wire recordings
of the last twenty-two years, which ones persist for you and which come
closest to the ideals (of abstract imagery) you have just talked about? Do you
ever get intimidated by what you did with Wire and hearing the distillation
of hours, days of effort whizzing by in two and a half minutes? The idea
has always been the essence of what you've done. At one point though
you became dangerously close to being pop stars. Would that have
been a contradiction? As an
artist whose job is communication, would you have valued the additional,
broader platform that a single would have given you to propagate your ideas? As you
said, different members of Wire might have had different approaches
to the larger platform that a hit would have given, and, again, well-speculated
on tensions within the group and everybody hating everybody at some point,
do you think that was part of the dynamo that drove the group? Do
you think that was part of the reason the recordings came out so successfully? Well,
people still bought the records, and continue to do so. In fact,
at one time Wire was labeled the "Pink Floyd of the New Wave." This
seemed such a huge accolade, and all four of you seemed to appreciate it
at the time. When
you settled into being Wire, just thinking of the time before Robert
(Gotobed) left, do you think your roles changed during that period? What,
in retrospect, do you think the roles were in the band? Was there
a clear dynamic of who did what unto whom? We were
talking about the roles within Wire and why. How did it change
when you became a three piece? Is Wire in
the past tense now or are you going to work together again? So many
people have taken Wire's example now, and there are so many people
who have gain some knowledge and influence from Wire, do you think
they would dislike being called the Wire of the late nineties? Wire
at the Stereo Society (selected
links): To
Wire discography
Click
to download Wire historical memorabilia, text or hi-res graphic.
Home Albums Artists Contact Downloads Help Links New Shopping Words
We encourage shopping:
|